Encryption require to set NetworkComms.DefaultSendReceiveOptions

[Anonymous]

Hello,

My application has a few connections some encrypted and some not.
First I tried like that:

Creating options:

var processors = new List<DataProcessor> { DPSManager.GetDataProcessor<SharpZipLibCompressor.SharpZipLibGzipCompressor>(), DPSManager.GetDataProcessor<RijndaelPSKEncrypter>() };
                var dataOptions = new Dictionary<string, string>();                
                RijndaelPSKEncrypter.AddPasswordToOptions(dataOptions, "godlike");
                var options = new SendReceiveOptions(DPSManager.GetDataSerializer<ProtobufSerializer>(), processors, dataOptions) { UseNestedPacket = true };

using them:

var listener = new TCPConnectionListener(_options, ApplicationLayerProtocolStatus.Enabled);

Doesn’t work. Got “Options must contain encryption key”. Which means that my key is not in the dictionary, but wait! I put it there.
Then I tried that:

RijndaelPSKEncrypter.AddPasswordToOptions(NetworkComms.DefaultSendReceiveOptions.Options, "godlike");

Suddenly works!

This is not the bug. It is design flaw. Encryption takes key/pass only from NetworkComms.DefaultSendReceiveOptions, but what if I need two different encrypted connections with different passwords? I MUST be missing something. I can’t believe that it is like that by design. Anyway it is not obvious at all, how one should handle situations like that.
I hope I am wrong and there is a genuine and graceful way two handle to separate encrypted connections.
Please, let me know.

Regards,
Igor.

• This topic was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by .

[Anonymous]

Heya Igor,

Thanks for the post. How do you start listening for incoming connections?

Regards,
Marc

[Anonymous]

Hi Marc,

I do it like that:

 var listener = new TCPConnectionListener(_options, ApplicationLayerProtocolStatus.Enabled);
                listener.AppendIncomingPacketHandler<string>("some message",
                                (header, connection, customObject) =>
                                {
                                    Console.WriteLine("\nReceived custom protobuf object from " + connection);
                                });
....
Connection.StartListening(listener, new IPEndPoint(ip, 0));

Thanks for quick response.

• This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by .

[Anonymous]

Heya iYalovoy,

I am investigating the problem.

Regards,
Marc

[Anonymous]

iYalovoy could you possible put together a simple console use case that demonstrates the problem and send me a download link, either forum or to support@networkcomms.net? This would allow me to find a solution faster.

Regards,
Marc

[Anonymous]

Always happy to contribute to library development!
[linkremoved]

[Anonymous]

This is a genuine bug. For the time being you might be able to get around it by replacing the following line:

listener.AppendIncomingPacketHandler<string>("Kill all humans",
                (header, con, customObject) =>
                {
                    Console.WriteLine("\nReceived custom protobuf object from " + con);
                });

with:

listener.AppendIncomingPacketHandler<string>("Kill all humans",
                (header, con, customObject) =>
                {
                    Console.WriteLine("\nReceived custom protobuf object from " + con);
                }, options);

I’m working on a fix so that your use case works as expected. It should be released as part of 3.0.1.

Regards,
Marc

[Anonymous]

Completly missed the fact, that AppendIncomingPacketHandler has SendReceiveOptions parameter.
Anyway, thanks for quick response. Keep going good work!

[Anonymous]

Well…
“might be able to” Means you haven’t even checked?
Because

listener.AppendIncomingPacketHandler<string>("Kill all humans",
                (header, con, customObject) =>
                {
                    Console.WriteLine("\nReceived custom protobuf object from " + con);
                }, options);

doesn’t work as well.

[Anonymous]

hmmm, it did work for me, perhaps I was on a different revision. I should hopefully be able to release 3.0.1 in a day or two which fixes it correctly.

Marc

[Author]

Posts