Home Forums Feature Requests Strong named assembly

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1358
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I guess the topic title talks for itself 🙂

    #1364
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Agreed. We are currently working on our next large feature release and will most likely move to Strong Named Assemblies as part of that.

    Many thanks for the suggestion.

    Regards,
    Marc

    #1368
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am so glad to hear that.Thanks for your excellent work.

    #1374
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    when will the 2.4 version release? I’m really looking forward to the new version. It’ll be so exciting

    #1384
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Good! When would that be released?

    #1386
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    We work on networkcomms.net in our free time because we do not make anywhere near enough from commercial licenses to cover our time. That means any new releases do not have a release date goal.

    #1466
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    This feature has been included from v3.0.0 onwards.

    #2257
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Great! thanks!

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.