Home › Forums › Feature Requests › Strong named assembly This topic has 7 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by Anonymous. Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total) Author Posts December 30, 2013 at 10:38 #1358 AnonymousInactive I guess the topic title talks for itself 🙂 December 31, 2013 at 15:01 #1364 AnonymousInactive Agreed. We are currently working on our next large feature release and will most likely move to Strong Named Assemblies as part of that. Many thanks for the suggestion. Regards, Marc January 1, 2014 at 16:59 #1368 AnonymousInactive I am so glad to hear that.Thanks for your excellent work. January 5, 2014 at 14:58 #1374 AnonymousInactive when will the 2.4 version release? I’m really looking forward to the new version. It’ll be so exciting January 7, 2014 at 14:25 #1384 AnonymousInactive Good! When would that be released? January 7, 2014 at 14:42 #1386 AnonymousInactive We work on networkcomms.net in our free time because we do not make anywhere near enough from commercial licenses to cover our time. That means any new releases do not have a release date goal. February 5, 2014 at 15:51 #1466 AnonymousInactive This feature has been included from v3.0.0 onwards. February 14, 2014 at 10:13 #2257 AnonymousInactive Great! thanks! Author Posts Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total) You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Log In Username: Password: Keep me signed in Log In